Saturday 12 October 2013

S2 Sackings

Since my first visit to the Lane that I remember in December 1999 - an FA Cup game against Rushden & Diamonds - United have gone through a total of seven managers, which will shortly become eight after the sacking of David Weir. Eight managers in just under 14 years translates to roughly a new manager every 21 months, but the reality, as all Unitedites know, is much worse. Neil Warnock, love him or loathe him (or both to some people, myself included), was in charge for 7 and a half years which means that, since his departure, we've seen a new manager for every 11 months since then. Bearing in mind that Blackwell (30 months) and Wilson (23 months) are both in that list, it sums up the failings of the appointments, not to mention slipping from the Premier League in Warnock's final game to languishing in 22nd place in League one after Weir's reign concluded.

Everyone will have different opinions on the managers we've endured in that period and whether they should/shouldn't have had more time, what went wrong and whether they should even have been appointed in the first place, so here are mine.

Neil Warnock - The manager I grew to love United under and the conductor of by far and away my favourite season as a Blade, 02/03, even with the ultimate heartbreak. After managerial turmoil before his appointment, Warnock stabilised that side of the club and was given the time to develop the team. Finally, we won promotion for the first and only time in my life so far and, from the very off, it seemed as though Warnock would only stay if survival was achieved. From my point of view, that season saw far too many wasted transfers on players like Ahmed Fathy, Luton Shelton and Mamadou Seck - almost £3 million of transfer fees for a handful of appearances and 0 Premier League goals. Yes, people can bemoan a lack of luck from Hulse's injury, the Tevez affair and Liverpool being given a penalty on the opening day but, ultimately, some truly horrendous signings left us high and dry. I'll always be glad of what Warnock did for the club, the memories he helped create, but I never want to see him in charge of United again and, from what I understand, neither does Kevin McCabe.

Bryan Robson - Where to begin?! I was at my Grandparent's when I heard that Robson was announced as the new manager and I couldn't believe it. My Grandad, a Villa fan, said he gave him until Christmas and he wasn't far off. He'd hardly set the world alight in his previous managerial roles and his appointment seemed very much like the board wanted to throw money at a world famous name. In the end, that's what it proved to be. Robson's start to the season wasn't unlike Weir's in terms of results, but off the field he was far from calming as a fan. After a truly dismal performance at Hillsborough in January 2008, Bryan Robson came out and lambasted his players saying that everything was their fault - not the best way to get already unhappy fans behind you. As if he hadn't insulted enough people with that outburst, over the next month he stated that he was disappointed at the lack of funds provided to him, despite splashing out £4 million on James Beattie and with the majority of players on Premier League wages. Ultimately, the final nail in his coffin came when he blamed the fans for his team being unable to beat lowly Scunthorpe United. He will most likely go down as my least favourite Blades manager I've ever seen in charge of my beloved club, unless of course, heaven forbid, we end up with Gary Megson!

Kevin Blackwell - A man of the Warnock era back to try his own hand in the hot seat this time. Several fans were initially unhappy with the appointment, given the fact that he left as our assistant to become manager of Leeds United, but I wonder how many of them wouldn't have done the same? Blackwell reinvigorated the team in the last 2 months of the season and his clear determination, honest evaluation and hard words united the team and fans in a real push for the play-offs, although they were never really on the cards after the Robson fiasco. The next season started and promotion was on the cards, like it should have been a year earlier. January came and, as the Blades know only too well, we once again sold our talisman of the season, this time it was Beattie. On paper we still had the squad to do it, and in the end we were only 3 points from automatic promotion.

That Burnley game at Wembley, well, one up front was a big mistake, Jamie Ward made one daft handball and was adjudged to have had another which got him sent off and the following two subs came too late to have an impact. The worst end to a season that should have seen us return to the top flight. Blackwell's response to that defeat showed he was a broken man and had no real confidence that he could better, or even equal his 'achievements' that season and threatened to resign, a motion stopped by the instant backing of Mr McCabe. For me, the board shouldn't have tried to keep Blackwell without hearing him out, gut instincts are a wonderful thing and shouldn't be discarded as easily as Blackwell's was. It's great to look back in hindsight and say this but had the board worked with Blackwell to bring in a replacement after the Burnley game, would we be in the mess we find ourselves today?

As things happened, Blackwell stayed and the next season turned out to be nothing more than mediocre. We missed out on the play-offs once again and fans started turning against Blackwell and his direct approach. Again we can point at things beyond our control, not least Paddy Kenny's 9-month ban which meant we had to settle for too many bit-part loanees throughout the season, including 3 goalkeepers as cover for Kenny. In addition to that, following the sale of the Kyle's to Spurs and Walker re-joining United for the season, Harry Redknapp's decision to recall him without leaving sufficient time for us to recruit a suitable back-up. If this season told us anything, it was that, no matter how hard he tried, Blackwell would never be able to recreate the highs of the previous year at the Lane. After finishing 8th, this was again a guilt-edged chance for the board to interact with Blackwell to help find a successor, or to back him further. Initially, the option they took was the latter, and Blackwell brought in 6 or 7 permanent transfers. We were all set to make another attack on the promotion race and started with a draw away at Cardiff but that was followed by a hammering to big spenders QPR. It's been suggested that the talks with the Football Fund, primarily Joe Sim, who was advised in part by our old friend Bryan Robson, was the reason behind Blackwell's sacking just two league games in. Whether true or not, there's no good explanation anyone could give for his sacking at that time in season.

Gary Speed - The late, great Gary Speed, a true legend of the game but sadly such a short career in management. He was only in charge at the Lane for four months and you can't gloss over his stats, they were far from great, but I believe Speed was the right appointment at that time. In the end, we had no right in stopping him chase his dream job and he was slowly rebuilding the Welsh national team before he tragically took his own life.

Micky Adams - After moving through two managers already that season and not even reaching Christmas yet, this was the time to take a long, hard look at the situation and appoint a manager with a clear footballing philosophy. As it happened, we made a move for Port Vale boss and boyhood Blade, Micky Adams who brought Alan Cork in as his assistant. It took 12 games before Adams led the team to their first win of his reign, even after bringing in another ex-Blade Dave Bassett as his consultant to help deal with the size of the task. This addition was the first sign that Adams was perhaps out of his depth and yet it was clear he kicked every ball, like Warnock and Blackwell before him, however the writing was on the wall from the off. After finishing 6 points adrift of safety, it didn't come as a surprise when Adams parted company with the club after less than 5 months.

Danny Wilson - It's fair to say that this was far from the most popular appointment, but, on paper, an excellent manager ready to implement his own style on the squad. This was the first time we'd given a new boss the summer to prepare for his initial match since the appointment of Robson. Wilson's ex-Wednesday links led to protests in the car park on the day he was announced, leading us to come across as a laughing stock in front of the rest of the footballing world. Yes, everyone has opinions about someone but some of our most hard-working players of the last few years have previously been at our neighbours, notably Richard Cresswell, Alan Quinn and fan favourite Derek Geary. 99% of fans seemed willing to give them a chance, so why was the situation different for Wilson?

In the end, he brought in his own men and tried to implement his own style slowly into the play, although this began to fade out again in his second season. In his first season at the Lane, racking up what would normally be more than enough points for automatic promotion, we were pipped late on and subsequently lost another play-off final. Nobody can deny that we were unlucky that season, if also too sloppy at times, and losing our top scorer at a crucial time with Cresswell also out injured was a double blow we couldn't pick ourselves up from. That season was probably the most competitive in League One history and should have served as a warning that we weren't in for an easy ride, especially given the squad cuts we had to make to fit in with the Financial Fair Play rules. Personally, I saw the following season as one that would be used to stabilise the club, letting Wilson build a solid footing that we could then push on from. As it turned out, the season did pan out to be just that, reaching the play-offs again but it was clear the board wanted more. A month before the season drew to an end, a truly baffling decision was made to sack Wilson in the hope that someone else would come in and give the squad a final lift. No doubt the boards thinking was along the same lines as Huddersfield Town and Wednesday the season before, however both of those had experienced managers lined up and were given more time, whilst we lumped our faith in Chris Morgan. Had Wilson remained in charge, not only would we have been better equipped in the play-offs, but we'd also be in a better league position today, I have no doubt of that.

David Weir - This was possibly the longest managerial decision the club has ever made, and was also the most positive reaction to a new manager I've experienced. Alright, he had no first hand knowledge but he had worked with Walter Smith and David Moyes so why not give him his time to shine? He came in wanting to transform the style of play, something that will never be achieved quickly in the lower leagues unless done in stages or with a brand new squad. The season came about and we got off to a flyer, playing some of the best football we've seen in years and, after having a poor season prior to this, Kevin McDonald was showing his true quality. Perhaps it was naive of Weir to stick all his plans for success around one man, but also don't forget the people who wrote the clause in McDonald's contract, probably his agent. The departure wouldn't have seemed so bad had he left for a higher league but the fact that he would be playing for a league rival? That was hard to take.

After that, we plummeted. Performances were lacklustre, there was little sign of even basic skill at times and, worst of all, we weren't showing any passion. I've grown up, with the exception of the Robson era, with close to 11 players fighting for themselves, their team mates and us fans even if they weren't the most talented bunch. For me, that passion on and off the field is what Sheffield United is all about, no matter what division we are in. The lack of goals has been a problem that set in towards the end of Wilson's tenure but Weir was failing to save it. Saying that, Tony McMahon has hit the woodwork at least twice this season, both times would have given us crucial goals against Rotherham and Crawley. Had we been 2-0 up at Rotherham rather than just one goal, would the result have been different? Probably not on the basis of our second half display, but if we had gone on to beat Crawley, that could well have galvanised the squad and bought Weir more time.

On the other hand, in the games I've seen this season and the reports from my Dad, it appears that too many players just can't be bothered, something that is totally unacceptable. As well as that, players like Maguire and Collins have failed to show their form of last season or the year before in Harry's case. One thing that has baffled me, and others, is how Michael Doyle still manages to keep the captain's armband. On his day, he is a player well suited to this division defensively, however he gets bogged down far too often by constantly chirping away at the referee and telling off his own players, very rarely does he show any encouragement, not to mention his poor interviews. I noticed earlier in the Colchester game that the only player who tried to encourage the players and crowd after conceding was Collins, and I hope the new manager changes his captain sooner rather than later.

I know many people won't agree with me but I still believe that, had Weir still been in charge by the end of the season, we would finish closer to the top of the table than the bottom, however it was clear from his interview on Tuesday that he was a defeated man. The timing of the sacking is the strangest part, two days before another crucial game and just hours after he had done his media duties for the game. Personally, I would have looked at bringing in an experienced head several weeks ago, similar to when Dave Bassett was brought back to help Adams. The problem, as is now the case when looking for a new manager, would be who could help? Perhaps Weir was too inexperienced and should have stuck to coaching for a while longer, his decision on Tuesday to make five changes for a game where a win against lower opposition would be the perfect time to regroup and build confidence was baffling, or were those changes due to players not wanting to play? Lee Carsley saying in the build up that lots of the squad did want to play added wood to the fire of stories that the dressing room was lost, something only the players can answer for. In the end, the fans just wanted the real United back. The teams that fought every game like it was the last they'd ever play but, the truth is, we've not seen a full team like that in far too long.

? - United's 27th full-time manager, whoever they may be, will hopefully be granted the time and resources required, first to stabilise the club and then push on to fulfil promotion back to the Championship. Who this will be, I have very little idea, however it is very important that the decision is made quickly, but effectively. Jim Phipps, one of the new board members, has come out today saying the same things and in two brilliant interviews, with Sky Sports and Radio Sheffield, has shown the club and himself in a very positive light. This isn't the first time, and I'm sure it won't be the last, that Jim's received praise from us Blades. As for names, Nigel Clough has seen his name thrown into the mix, an appointment who would work on continuing the current philosophy but with more experience than Weir. The consensus among Derby fans was that they were disappointed with his sacking and he certainly stabilised the club, however he didn't necessarily push them on as much as they could. A name that I would have been more than happy with in the summer, although people had their doubts, would be Russell Slade. He's shown this season so far that he can build a winning team if given the time to do so and has come on a great deal since he was linked with us back in 2011. One of the problems of hiring Slade could well be that he is full of old connections to the club, and we know how that ended for Micky Adams. Again, a name that I've mentioned before as one who can help implement our wanted philosophy and use the younger players to our advantage would be Steve Davis of Crewe, however he lacks League One experience and his side have struggled so far this year, despite a good season last year.

Other than these, I can't see many inspiring managers who would want to come in, particularly not on the bookmakers lists, but the summer proved just how far from the outcome they can be. Hopefully we get a new boss in sooner rather than later, and can finally reach our squads potential, because we don't have relegation players. The problem is, I'm not certain we have a squad of promotion-chasing ones either at the current stage. The biggest point is that we back whoever comes in 100%, as Weir suffered from a lack of this. I've grown fed up of people asking why people still backed our ex-manager, but the truth is if you don't back him, you can't fully support the club. Sometimes you've just got to put all other thoughts out of your head and urge on the people who can make a difference whether you believe they can or not.

The only was is up, right?

Saturday 21 September 2013

From the Prince to King.

It's been three weeks now since it was confirmed that Sheffield United would be receiving substantial investment for the first team from a mystery foreign investor. A few days and another defeat later, Prince Abdullah bin Mosaad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud was named as the new co-owner who wants to see us in the Premier League within the next 5 years, estimated to be bringing with him an initial £20 million worth of funding. With transfer fees being paid for several targets already this season, including Florent Cuvelier and Jose Baxter, it is clear that the Prince is willing to back David Weir, but for how long?

As the talks with Prince Abdullah started back in January, it is likely that he was involved in the manager selection process, albeit as an outsider, but to me this shows that he supported the selection of Weir. Add this to the fact that United are with their 6th permanent manager in as many years and Kevin McCabe keeping half of the ownership, hopefully we won't see many rash decisions in terms of a quick-fire sacking.

Blades won't need reminding of our poor performances this season, particularly the second half showing at Rotherham, and those who made the long trip north to Carlisle last weekend, only to have to wait 80+ minutes before they saw us have a shot on target. United fans have been calling out for a goal scorer, they may have got one this week with Marlon King, but is the price worth paying?

King must be close to holding the record for the most convictions for a sportsman who still gains employment. Thousands of Unitedite's, myself included, are disappointed by the signing of such a high-profile criminal who's previous actions have been downright vile. Many are willing to look past a criminal record if it contains one or two petty crimes, the likes of minor driving bans etc, that happened while the player was young and naive if they are clearly ashamed and have learnt from their mistakes. King's record is different though, for a start he is a current member of the Sex Offenders Register and only 2 months ago was arrested in relation to a hit-and-run to be bailed pending further inquiries.

Many people have been talking about Ched Evans again this week, asking why people were happy to support him on-field whilst he was awaiting his own trial. For me, that answer lies in the rightful British culture where we treat people as innocent until proven guilty. As soon as he was found guilty, that was the end of the backing forever as far as the majority of Blades are concerned and very little else needs to be said about it. The fact that he was found guilty by those who heard all the evidence both initially and again in his appeal is more than enough to never want him, or those like him, back at our club.

One of the worst things from the King signings this week was his interview with Radio Sheffield's Rob Staton. At the end of the interview he was asked what he thought of Blades fans responses to his signing to which he all but said he didn't care about our opinions or appreciates our concerns, a lack of class shown for a start. When almost given an easy way out to pull back a small bit of credit by Rob asking whether he could reassure people that his previous trouble was over, King's response was to avoid the question completely, not even showing the slightest bit of remorse.

For me, the signing smacks of near desperation, Weir has almost been forced into signing a proven goalscorer and has jumped straight in for one that some of the current squad and Lee Carsley have all played with, despite his history. As we proved against Carlisle and Rotherham, you have no hope in scoring many goals if you create very little or are afraid to shoot. Never have I been more disappointed in a signing, particular given both Sheffield club's recent history with the likes of Ched and Gary Madine.

I'm certainly not alone with these thoughts, but it is the responses people are planning that separate us. An awful lot have shown their displeasure already over social media or by writing to the club personally with several interacting with the new directors James Phipps and Selahattin Baki on Twitter. These two have impressed on the social aspect so far, as they are willing to converse openly with fans, asking for opinions and taking the time to understand the culture of our beloved club. I just hope those responsible understand why we are so disappointed.

I have faith that all the supporters will stick by the club and the majority will attempt to ignore King. Some have signalled that they will do that by not attending matches and fair play to them for that. Me, I'll still attend the games I can and listen on the radio supporting the club, in particular the other 10 men on the field and the manager. I will neither cheer nor boo King, and applause for any goals he might score will be because United have scored, not him. Anyone who is planning on booing today, or at future games, please don't as it can only cause negativity and we have enough of that already. After all, we all want one thing to happen and that is for the Blades to succeed.

Monday 18 February 2013

If League One Was Sunday League

Yesterday afternoon, I saw a tweet from @Berkshireblade asking whether or not anyone had created a table of what League One would look like if Portsmouth FC were to fold. Being a fan of all things statistical, I was intrigued to find out what the effects of Pompey 'folding', like a Sunday League side, would have on the rest of the table. After watching the Blades for the last 18 months in the third tier, this wasn't the first time I had likened it to the Sunday League, either.

As of 17/02/2013, the League One table looked like this:

Position
Team
P
F
A
GD
Pts
1
Bournemouth
33
57
42
15
58
2
Sheff Utd
32
47
29
18
57
3
Yeovil
32
55
40
15
57
4
Doncaster
31
44
29
15
57
5
Tranmere
32
47
31
16
56
6
Swindon
31
52
21
31
55
7
Brentford
31
45
32
13
54
8
Coventry
33
53
40
13
50
9
Walsall
33
46
48
-2
48
10
Leyton Orient
32
36
39
-3
46
11
Notts County
32
44
35
9
45
12
MK Dons
30
40
34
6
44
13
Crewe
31
38
40
-2
44
14
Stevenage
30
37
41
-4
43
15
Crawley
29
38
42
-4
42
16
Carlisle
32
40
55
-15
40
17
Preston
32
41
42
-1
38
18
Shrewsbury
33
36
40
-4
37
19
Scunthorpe
33
36
55
-19
35
20
Colchester
32
31
50
-19
32
21
Oldham
31
32
45
-13
30
22
Bury
32
31
48
-17
27
23
Hartlepool
32
28
53
-25
24
24
Portsmouth
33
34
57
-23
23

When looking through the results, some stuck out as having larger influences on position, namely Swindon's two matches which resulted in two wins and +6 GD for the Robins. However, due to Portsmouth's horrendous season to date, Swindon's position would not be the worst if Pompey were to leave the league now.

The table below shows what the table would look like if the Portsmouth results were removed from the system, again as of 17/02/2013.

Position
Team
P
F
A
GD
Pts
1
Tranmere
31
45
29
16
55
2
Sheff Utd
31
46
29
17
54
3
Yeovil
30
52
37
15
54
4
Doncaster
30
43
29
14
54
5
Bournemouth
31
54
41
13
54
6
Brentford
30
44
32
12
51
7
Swindon
29
45
20
25
49
8
Coventry
32
52
39
13
49
9
Crewe
30
38
38
0
44
10
MK Dons
29
38
32
6
43
11
Leyton Orient
31
33
37
-4
43
12
Walsall
31
42
47
-5
42
13
Stevenage
29
35
40
-5
40
14
Notts County
30
39
35
4
39
15
Crawley
27
36
38
-2
39
16
Preston
31
41
42
-1
37
17
Shrewsbury
32
35
37
-2
37
18
Carlisle
30
35
52
-17
36
19
Scunthorpe
31
33
52
-19
32
20
Colchester
30
26
46
-20
28
21
Oldham
30
31
45
-14
27
22
Bury
31
29
48
-19
24
23
Hartlepool
30
25
52
-27
20


Initially, eyes are drawn to the promotion and relegation places in the new table. In regards to the top, Tranmere move up four places, swapping positions with current league leaders Bournemouth while Brentford and Swindon also switch places. At the bottom, very little happens in terms of position for the bottom five, although Oldham and Bury slip slightly closer to safety.

The place where most moves occur, is in the middle of the table. To make comparisons easier between the two tables, I created a third that is colour coded and position changes noted.

Pos Change
Pos
Team
P
F
A
GD
Pts
+ 4
1
Tranmere
31
45
29
16
55
2
Sheff Utd
31
46
29
17
54
3
Yeovil
30
52
37
15
54
4
Doncaster
30
43
29
14
54
- 4
5
Bournemouth
31
54
41
13
54
+ 1
6
Brentford
30
44
32
12
51
- 1
7
Swindon
29
45
20
25
49
8
Coventry
32
52
39
13
49
+ 4
9
Crewe
30
38
38
0
44
+2
10
MK Dons
29
38
32
6
43
- 1
11
Leyton Orient
31
33
37
-4
43
- 3
12
Walsall
31
42
47
-5
42
+ 1
13
Stevenage
29
35
40
-5
40
- 3
14
Notts County
30
44
35
9
39
15
Crawley
27
36
38
-2
39
+ 1
16
Preston
31
41
42
-1
37
+ 1
17
Shrewsbury
32
35
37
-2
37
- 2
18
Carlisle
30
35
55
-20
36
19
Scunthorpe
31
33
52
-19
32
20
Colchester
30
26
46
-20
28
21
Oldham
30
31
45
-14
27
22
Bury
31
29
48
-19
24
23
Hartlepool
30
25
52
-27
20

Teams may have only moved one or two positions in most cases, however the league remains closely contested with only 12 points separating Crawley in 15th from the play-off places.

Personally, I would be incredibly surprised if the league would allow Portsmouth to leave the league mid-season given the problems it would cause them. Despite that and given the changes it has on the league at this stage of the season, I wonder what the overall effect would be at the end of the season. My thoughts would be that the changes wouldn't be as drastic as all 23 remaining teams would have played Portsmouth twice, however, teams like Crewe and Shrewsbury who have suffered one defeat apiece already at the hands of the south coast club could find positives (in this table only) if they were to lose against them for a second time.